Note: 1 and 2 Samuel were initially part of a single text, also connected to the Book of Kings. We have used the traditional division here purely to focus discussion, but we should keep in mind the broader context as we read.

Summary of 1 Samuel...

The books of Samuel discuss the beginnings of the monarchy in Israel. It is a political and religious narrative, highlighting tensions between two major factions as the Israelite people transition from tribal confederation to organised nation. It centres on three characters in particular; Samuel, the last Judge; Saul, the first king; and David, a shepherd-become-warrior who ultimately replaces Saul and establishes a family dynasty. In particular, David is significant for understanding the way people understood the importance of Jesus later on.

Samuel, after whom the book is named, is a young boy who trains as a priest (Chapters 1-2). As he grows, not only does he become the High Priest, but also becomes a prophet (receiving messages for the people from God, (1 Sam 3:19-21) and then becomes the last Judge of the Israelites (1 Sam 7:15).

An short story in the early stages of 1 Samuel concerns the Ark (the sacred chest that holds relics from the time of Moses) which was believed to house the presence of God. In Chapters 4-7 it exchanges hands back and forth between the Israelites and the neighboring pagan Philistines.

In Chapter 8, Samuel is given the responsibility for appointing and consecrating Israel’s first king, after Israel demands one in order to be like the nations around them. Samuel is originally reluctant to appoint anyone, believing that a human king was a challenge to the sovereignty of God (1 Sam 8:6-7). However, God assures Samuel that he does not hold Samuel responsible for the Israelite’s attitude and tells him to go ahead and appoint one (1 Sam 8:22).

A process of selection follows, where 'lots' (like drawing straws or flipping a coin) are drawn to decide Israel’s king. The tribe of Benjamin (1 Sam 10:20) is selected, and then a particular family called the Matrites (1 Sam 10:21). Finally from that family is selected a man named Saul. Saul is a reluctant choice, and actually hides in the luggage when it becomes time for him to be proclaimed (1 Sam 10:22). However, he is ultimately appointed to the role and soon is tested in action against Israel’s enemies. Saul and his son Jonathan lead the Israelites into battle against the Ammonites and then the Philistines (1 Sam 11-13).

In the lead up to the battle against the Philistines, Saul waits for Samuel to arrive to give the people direction from God (1 Sam 13:8). Samuel is late to the meeting point, so Saul performs a sacrifice (which only priests were meant to do) seeking well-being from God to boost morale among the Israelite troops (1 Sam 13:9). When Samuel does finally arrive (1 Sam 13:10), he condemns Saul for disobeying the laws, and states that his family will ultimately be replaced as royals (1 Sam 13:13-15).

A similar condemnation follows a battle against the Amalekites in 1 Sam 15, where Saul is commanded to destroy every man, woman, child and animal belonging to that nation. Saul completes much of the destruction, but captures the king (presumably for ransom or as a trophy) and keeps the best animals to sacrifice. Samuel again declares that Saul’s disobedience will cost him, stating that he will be replaced ‘by a neighbour’ (1 Sam 15:28). The chapter closes by pointedly stating that “the LORD was sorry that he had made Saul king over Israel” (1 Sam 15:35, NRSV).

The ‘neighbour’ who is to replace Saul is soon revealed to be a son of Jesse from Bethlehem, one of the towns belonging to the tribe of Judah (1 Sam 16:1). After a process of reviewing Jesse’s sons, Samuel identifies Jesse’s youngest son David as the future king. David is anointed with oil by Samuel (1 Sam 16:10-13).

David, however, soon finds himself drawn into the centre of Israelite politics. His musical ability as well as his defeat of the Philistine giant warrior Goliath gives David a place of prestige in Saul’s court (1 Sam 16:1 – 1 Sam 17:58). He then grows in stature, commanding Saul’s armies into victory after victory. (1 Sam 18:5-7). Additionally, David becomes close friends with Saul’s son Jonathan (1 Sam 18:1-4), and marries Saul’s daughter Michal (1 Sam 18:27). These actions combined with growing public admiration for David make Saul increasingly jealous (1 Sam 18:28-29). He attempts to kill David, although David escapes with the aid of Jonathan (1 Sam 19:1-20:42)

David lives as an outlaw from Saul for the remainder of 1 Samuel (1 Sam 21:1-31:13), although he is an outlaw with an army. The story tells us that numbers of people flock to David, increasing his numbers. David is tested against both Saul and against the Philistines, and each time David manages to avoid capture and defeat. On the other hand, Saul eventually meets his match in a battle against the Philistines, and is killed with Jonathan at the conclusion of 1 Samuel (1 Sam 31).


What 1 Samuel may have meant to its original audience...

1 and 2 Samuel were initially the one text, probably divided into two when the book was first translated from Hebrew to Greek. It continues on from where Judges leaves off. Many scholars think that Joshua, Judges, 1 and 2 Samuel and 1 and 2 Kings are all part of a series of books that scholars call the Deuteronomistic History.

The book outlines the establishment of the monarchy, and much of it likely serves as an apologetic for the rise of David and the establishment of his house of his predecessor Saul. The book is important for justifying the ongoing rule of the “House of David”, which rules all the way to the end of the Kingdom of Judea, where the legal code of Deuteronomy is probably established under the rule of King Josiah. By the time the book of Samuel enters into its final form, the Israelites have been split by civil war. The northern half (10 tribes) becomes the Kingdom of Israel, with kingship following the leader most able to hold the throne. In the south, the tribes of Judah and Benjamin become the Kingdom of Judah. The king there is always an ancestor of David. Later Judah is taken into captivity in Babylon, and is then ruled by Persians, Greeks and Romans. David is the idealised king for this captive people, and his name becomes synonymous with a return to Judean independence. The hopeful expectation of a restored throne from the ‘House of David’ looms large for the remaining Jewish population—if only they can remain faithful to the laws of Deuteronomy.

With David such an important figure in both the story of the kings, and in Judah's national identity, justifying and explaining the rise of David over the kingdom’s founder Saul is important. The text goes to lengths to emphasise David’s covenantal superiority, while Saul’s decline is likewise explained in religious terms. In 1 Samuel, David—although not completely perfect—is nevertheless painted as an ideal king, which in turn heavily influences the way that David is interpreted by later audiences…a “man after God’s own heart” (see 1 Samuel 13:14 and Acts 13:22).

The stories surrounding the Ark of the Covenant were also probably important part of the religious formation of the Israelites, as they highlighted the plagues that could befall people if due respect was not shown to the sacred relics (1 Sam 4-6). These stories possibly served to justify the eventual building of a safe holding place for these relics, the Temple in Jerusalem, which would be built under the reign of Solomon and dominate Jewish religious life until the destruction of the Second Temple in 70 CE.


How Jesus might have read 1 Samuel...

The kingship of Israel plays a significant role in the story of Jesus. The Gospel authors emphasise his connection to the ‘House of David’, and the ultimate hope of the recovery of the kingly line. This is a particular emphasis in the Gospel of Matthew, where Jesus’ family tree (genealogy) traces his ultimate descent from King David (1:6). The story of the wise men from the East (Matt 2) argues that Jesus' is a royal birth. Luke also shows the genealogy leading back through the line of kings (Luke 3:31). The nativity story in Luke likewise says that Jesus will be given “David’s throne” and that “there will be no end to his kingdom” (Luke 1:32-33) Luke 4:32-33). Nathaniel declares Jesus “the King of Israel” in the Gospel of John and Jesus has to withdraw when the people want to make him a king (John 6:15). Other references from the epistles of the New Testament also have Jesus being referred to as ‘king’ or ruling a kingdom (Col 1:13; 1 Tim 6:14-15; 2 Tim 4:1, 4:18; 2 Peter 1:11; Revelation 1:5, 17:14, 19:16).

However, from Jesus himself the overwhelming number of positive references to kingship refer to God the Father. Without getting into any detailed Trinitarian debate here, it is worth acknowledging that kingly titles are not really claimed by Jesus himself (some of the few examples are his ‘kingly’ entries into Jerusalem (Matt 21:1-11, Mk 11:1-11, John 12:12-15), that mocked royal processions. Also see his reference to a throne in Matt 25:31-46). Jesus is elusive when asked directly if he is king of the Jews (Matt 7:11, Lk 23:3, Jn 18:33-38), even though it is the title placed over his head at his crucifixion (Mk 15, Lk 23:38, Jn 19:19). However, the Kingdom of Heaven and Kingdom of God are concepts that are fully and frequently alluded to by Jesus.

The earthly kings that Jesus does refer to are rarely positive references. Even when they are seen as allegories of the “Kingdom of Heaven”, the kings are harsh and brutal in their meting out of justice. Although such actions are normally in response to a story where some crime has been committed, there is still an uncomfortable violence about these encounters—probably in line with cultural expectations of rulers at the time (for example, Matt 18:23-25, 22:1-14). The ruling Herod family are never positive images of kingly administration as they massacre infants, call for John the Baptist’s head and preside over Jesus’ trial. Jesus foresees that his disciples will be on trial before governors and kings because of him (Mk 13:9). Kings wage war (Lk 14:31) and slaughter enemies (Lk 19:38).

The point is that the kind of king that Saul, David and the rest of the Israelite rulers would become were a far cry from the justice, hope and compassion that Jesus envisioned in his teachings of the Kingdom of God. While people were quick to misunderstand Jesus' meaning and hoped he would establish a physical, religious state, the kingdom described by Jesus is a dramatic alternative to the type of kings that Saul and his successors would be.

So what does this say about Jesus' potential approach to 1 Samuel? It is possible that he would despairingly restate 1 Sam 8:10-18… the description of the hardship a human king would place on their people. He seems to echo this royal oppression in his description of the man who went to get ‘royal power’ in Luke 19, who ‘takes what he did not deposit’, ‘reaps what he did not sow’ and ‘kills those that did not want him to be king over them’.

The better alternative is the Kingdom of God – God as king – whose anger is directed not at those who are merely ignorant, but those who ignore what God cares most about… compassion and justice. For this reason, it is likely that Jesus would be more likely to look back to the prophets - those who challenge the absolute rule of monarchs - rather than the kings themselves.


What 1 Samuel might mean for our faith today...

A key feature in 1 Samuel is the way that politics, governance and religion combine. In the modern western world, these are concepts that normally lead to deep division, debate and resentment. Yet for those who hold to a faith, the questions raised by Samuel are valid and important ones.

The Judge, priest and prophet Samuel initially baulks at the Israelites’ request for a king—possibly because it is a rejection of his own leadership. However, God reminds Samuel that it is a rejection of Godself, and not Samuel, that the Israelites are proposing. It is interesting here that God allows kingship. It is not a command, but a concession. As such, God only allows it with thorough warnings about what a king will do.

It is interesting, then, that so much emphasis would be placed on God's protection of royalty in Israelite and Christian teachings, including Jewish messianic expectations, and the medieval Christian understanding of ‘Divine Right’ monarchs, who ruled by God’s appointment. However, as Saul's dramatic fall from grace demonstrates, the power that God gives to kings in 1 Samuel purely depends upon the extent to which they live up to God’s ideals. While much is made in current Christian thought of Paul’s advice to submit to authorities or Jesus’ statement to ‘render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s’, 1 Samuel reminds us that such authorities should only be in place if they are faithful to the covenant with God.

Christians believe in a different form of covenant from the Hebrew Bible… as discussed on the Leviticus page, we are to replace a ‘covenant of holiness’ with a ‘covenant of compassion’. If we are to balance the principals of kingship with the ideas of Jesus, we cannot blindly agree to follow our leaders, no matter the country we belong to. 20th Century theologian Dietrich Bonoheffer famously makes the point as he establishes that, as Christians, we are to stand up for the victims of injustice.

This is an important reminder in a world today where leaders appeal to us not on the basis of justice and compassion, but through personal agendas, promises of wealth and economic stability, or protection at the expense of our enemies.


Some questions for 1 Samuel... 

+ A Matter of Habit

The Biblical character David is most famous for two incidents. In 1 Samuel, as an untested shepherd boy, he kills the Philistine champion giant Goliath with a slingshot.

The second incident, this time in in 2 Samuel, sees David established as king in Jerusalem. One infamous night, he spots a woman, Bathsheba, bathing and has her summoned to his rooms. The encounter results in a pregnancy. Knowing that Bathsheba is married, David scandelously has the woman's husband murdered so that he can marry her and hide his adultery.

The incident is regarded as one of the few public flaws in David as king... but its actually just the latest in a line of dubious activities. Already married to Michal, the daughter of Saul, David then marries a woman named Abigail (1 Sam 25) after her husband dies ten days after refusing hospitality to David and his band of renegades.

While the death was 'supernatural', David's anger towards the man (named Nabal) was not. In fact, he had been on the verge of attacking and killing everyone in the household when Abigail brought supplies to David and begged for mercy.

Whether Nabal's death was an act of "the Lord" or of someone else, David didn't leave Abigail to grieve long, marrying her shortly after. At the same time, he also took a woman named "Ahinoam" (1 Sam 25:43) as his wife. The whole episode was perhaps less a love story for the ages, and more about proving that David gets what David wants - a prelude to David's story with Bathsheba.